Rand Paul's drone filibuster shakes up Republicans

Sen. Rand Paul's filibuster got results: the White House acknowledged that killing US citizens suspecting of being terrorists must follow the rule of law. But it also shook up the Republican caucus.

By Brad Knickerbocker,?Staff writer / March 7, 2013

Sen. Rand Paul (R) of Kentucky leaves the floor of the Senate after his filibuster of the nomination of John Brennan to be CIA director on Capitol Hill early Thursday. Later in the day, the full Senate voted, 63 to 34, to confirm Brennan.

Charles Dharapak/AP

Enlarge

Sen. Rand Paul?s 12-plus hour filibuster was never going to block Senate confirmation of John Brennan to be CIA director, and indeed the full Senate voted, 63 to 34, Thursday afternoon to approve Mr. Brennan as the nation?s next spymaster.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

Subscribe Today to the Monitor

Click Here for your FREE 30 DAYS of
The Christian Science Monitor
Weekly Digital Edition

But Senator Paul?s unusual maneuver ? actually talking for hours on end, and not just threatening to filibuster ? has had an immediate effect on a key issue that many lawmakers (and many voters) find troubling: the use of unmanned drone aircraft to kill suspected terrorists, including, potentially, US citizens on US soil.

Forced to respond, Attorney General Eric Holder in a three-line letter to Paul Thursday addressed what had been posed by Senate Republicans as a constitutional question: "Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?"

?The answer to that question is no,? Mr. Holder, wrote ? at long last, in the view of his critics. In a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Wednesday, Holder would only say that killing a hypothetical suspected American terrorist on US soil who poses no immediate threat would be ?inappropriate.?

Holder?s letter satisfied Paul.

?I?m quite happy with the answer, and I?m disappointed it took a month and a half and a root canal to get it,? Paul?told CNN. ?But we did get the answer. And that?s what I?ve been asking all along.?

Like his father, former presidential candidate and US Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, the junior senator from Kentucky is as much libertarian as he is Republican. Where most GOP lawmakers position themselves as foreign policy and military hawks, Rand Paul strongly questions some aspects of US policy here ? particularly as in this case where constitutional issues regarding judicial due process are involved.

This rankles some senior Republicans. On Thursday, Sen. John McCain (R) of Arizona described some of what Paul had said during his filibuster as ?simply false.?

Quoting from a Wall Street Journal editorial, Mr. McCain said, ?If Mr. Paul wants to be taken seriously, he needs to do more than pull political stunts that fire up impressionable libertarian kids in college dorms.?

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R) of South Carolina, McCain?s chief ally on such matters, called Paul?s unusual effort ?ill-informed.?

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/6-A9QG2wg7A/Rand-Paul-s-drone-filibuster-shakes-up-Republicans

go daddy Tom Kenny Long Island Medium Alfonso Ribeiro adam sandler College Football Scoreboard nfl scores